Arenas by Munsey & Suppes
Baseball Basketball Football Hockey
Olympics Race Tracks Soccer Mall
  BALLPARKS.com© 1996-2008 by 
  Paul Munsey & Cory Suppes 
  About BALLPARKS.com 
  Advertising 
  Awards & Publicity 
  Disclaimer 

  Ballparks Virtual Mall 
  CFL Past, Present & Future Stadiums 
  MLB Past, Present & Future Ballparks 

  NBA Past, Present & Future Arenas 

  Barclays Center 
  Orlando Magic Arena 
  Sacramento Kings Arena 

  NCAA Past, Present & Future Stadiums 
  NFL Past, Present & Future Stadiums 
  NHL Past, Present & Future Arenas 
  Olympic Past & Future Stadiums 

  National Basketball Association Tickets 

  Atlanta Hawks Tickets 
  Boston Celtics Tickets 
  Charlotte Bobcats Tickets 
  Chicago Bulls Tickets 
  Cleveland Cavaliers Tickets 
  Dallas Mavericks Tickets 
  Denver Nuggets Tickets 
  Detroit Pistons Tickets 
  Golden State Warriors Tickets 
  Houston Rockets Tickets 
  Indiana Pacers Tickets 
  Los Angeles Lakers Tickets 
  Los Angeles Clippers Tickets 
  Memphis Grizzlies Tickets 
  Miami Heat Tickets 
  Milwaukee Bucks Tickets 
  Minnesota Timberwolves Tickets 
  New Jersey Nets Tickets 
  New Orleans Hornets Tickets 
  New York Knicks Tickets 
  Orlando Magic Tickets 
  Philadelphia 76ers Tickets 
  Phoenix Suns Tickets 
  Portland Trail Blazers Tickets 
  Sacramento Kings Tickets 
  San Antonio Spurs Tickets 
  Toronto Raptors Tickets 
  Utah Jazz Tickets 
  Washington Wizards Tickets 

  MLB Tickets 
  NASCAR Tickets 
  NBA Tickets 
  NCAA Basketball Tickets 
  NCAA Football Tickets 
  NFL Tickets 
  NHL Tickets 
  Olympic Tickets 
  Soccer Tickets 
  Concert Tickets 
  Golf Tickets 
  Theater Tickets 

  

  

    

    

Sacramento Kings Arena
Sacramento Kings Arena

  Arena Resources  
Address
Sacramento, CA 95834
Phone
Weather
Newspaper
Kings Gear
  Calendar of Events  
Hotels, Dining & Deals in Sacramento

  The Facility  
Opened Unknown
Ownership
(Management)
Cost of Construction Unknown
Arena Financing
Naming Rights
Arena Architects Unknown
  Other Facts  
Tenants Sacramento Kings (NBA)
Future
Sacramento Monarchs (WNBA)
Future
Population Base 2,600,000
On Site Parking Unknown
Nearest Airport Sacramento International Airport (SMF)
Retired Numbers #1 Nate Archibald
#2 Mitch Richmond
#6 Sixth Man
#11 Bob Davies
#12 Maurice Stokes
#14 Oscar Robertson
#27 Jack Twyman
#44 Sam Lacey

Championships 1st

1951

  Seating  
Capacity Unknown
Average Ticket $59.80
(2005-2006)
Fan Cost Index (FCI) $310.70
(2005-2006)
The Team Marketing Report FCI includes: four average-price tickets; four small soft drinks; two small beers; four hot dogs; two game programs; parking; and two adult-size caps.
Luxury Suites Unknown
Club Seats Unknown
  Attendance History  
Season  Total  Capacity Change
1992-93 709,997 100% 1.8%
1993-94 709,997 100% 0%
1994-95 709,997 100% 0%
1995-96 709,997 100% 0%
1996-97 709,997 100% 0%
1997-98 605,434 85% -14.7%
1998-99 418,751 97% -30.8%
1999-00 720,033 100% 71.9%
2000-01 709,997 100% 0.8%

2001-02 2002-03 2003-04 2004-05
710,051 709,997 709,997 709,997

2005-06 2006-07 2007-08 2008-09
709,997 709,817 547,556

1992-Present - Attendance at the ARCO Arena, Sacramento, CA.
1998-1999 - Attendance for 25 games due to NBA lockout.

Sources: Mediaventures

SACRAMENTO STANDOFF
New arena plans have capital deeply divided

Tom FitzGerald, Chronicle Staff Writer
Friday, April 1, 2005

Sacramento -- New arenas continue to pop up in NBA cities around the country. They are full of what pro sports people like to call "amenities'' -- snazzy bars and restaurants, state-of-the-art scoreboards with high-resolution video screens, corporate suites and luxurious locker rooms worthy of the millionaire ballplayers they house.

The Memphis Grizzlies and New Orleans Hornets moved from Vancouver and Charlotte, N.C., to arenas that were financed completely by public largesse. Charlotte, in turn, landed the expansion Bobcats with an arena that will open in October. Its $265 million cost was paid in part by $100 million from local financial institutions, $23 million in up-front lease payments by the club, and the rest from taxes on hotels and rental cars.

Even Kansas City, which lost the Kings to Sacramento in 1985, is building a $250 million downtown arena, largely with hotel and rental car taxes. The city is operating on the premise: If we build it, NBA Commissioner David Stern will come.

Meanwhile, in trying to replace antiquated ARCO Arena, Sacramento is shooting nothing but airballs.

The Kings want somebody to show them the money, but Sacramentans have made it clear that tax money won't be involved. Two plans to build a publicly- funded arena downtown never made it to a ballot. A third try, by landowners in the North Natomas area near ARCO, looks doomed, too. Their plan would have funded an arena in return for getting their land rezoned for residential development more rapidly.

"I think it's dead,'' Kings co-owner Joe Maloof said. "We appreciated them trying."

Maloof and brother Gavin -- the family owns 54 percent of the Kings -- have a management style similar to that of Dallas Mavericks owner Mark Cuban. They are not only service-first bosses but highly visible cheerleaders, lacking only Cuban's cloying self-promotion.

On the other hand, while the Maloofs are circumspect when it comes to committing much of their own money to the arena project, Cuban and the owners of the NHL's Dallas Stars put up the lion's share of the money for the $400 million American Airlines Center, completed in 2001. The city of Dallas provided just $125 million, again mostly from hotel and rental car taxes. The high-tech arena has 144 luxury suites, all of them sold on a season basis.

ARCO Arena, built in 1988, has just 30 luxury suites. Its seating capacity of 17,317 is fourth smallest in the NBA. The seats rest on uncovered plywood. The concourses are too narrow to accommodate the crowds. And, Joe Maloof pointed out, "We get roof leaks all the time."

What makes the arena saga strange is that Sacramento and the Kings are one of the great love affairs in the increasingly rancorous world of pro sports. Although their one real window of opportunity for an NBA title closed three years ago -- on a buzzer-beating 3-point shot by Robert Horry of the Los Angeles Lakers in Game 4 of the Western Conference finals -- they have sold out ARCO for 263 straight games despite having some of the highest ticket prices in the NBA.

Though on track for their seventh straight playoff appearance, the Kings have gone through a rough patch since trading Chris Webber, 32, a great but often gimpy player whose career seems on the descent, to Philadelphia a month ago. But the boos at ARCO are generally reserved for the visitors and refs, as when beloved guard Mike Bibby was ejected in the closing seconds of a recent loss to the Warriors.

All that good will for Sacramento's only major-league team hasn't translated to much political and economic support for a new arena.

Environmentalists complain that much of the land in the latest arena scheme rests on a flood plain and would require major drainage facilities. It also is considered habitat for 122 protected species, mainly the Swainson's hawk and the giant garter snake.

"There's a sky-is-falling mentality that they'll leave if we don't provide an arena for the Maloofs,'' said Vicki Lee, head of the local chapter of the Sierra Club. "Why should they, if they can get the leadership of Sacramento to be gullible enough to open areas that don't have public infrastructure, that are part of a habitat conservation plan? It's like none of that matters. We'll skim enough money off the top, and the millionaire Maloofs won't have to pay off."

"These landowners just wanted to get on the fast track for urban development,'' said Jim Pachl, attorney for the group Friends of the Swainson's Hawk. "Gee, if these guys are willing to give up 20 percent of their profits, they must know they're going to have some real problems getting through the normal governmental processes. The whole purpose was to railroad entitlements that would be controversial.''

All this political and economic wrangling has players feeling the strain, as well.

"I'm hoping they're going to find a solution,'' the Kings' leading scorer, forward Peja Stojakovic, said. "This city and these people deserve a professional team. We enjoy being here and playing basketball. They've been loyal to us, and we've been loyal to them. It's a great relationship.''

Within a few years, though, that loyalty could be put to the test if an arena plan isn't forthcoming.

"I never anticipated we'd have the kind of delays we've had,'' Joe Maloof said. "It's been tough. I don't know what it's going to take."

Would the Kings consider leaving a city that holds them in its warm embrace, a metropolitan area that has 2.1 million residents and is adding 50, 000 every year?

"We're not considering that,'' Maloof said. "We've never talked about something like that. Our game plan is to put something in Sacramento. We've just got to get something done here.''

Others wonder.

When the latest arena idea foundered, the Sacramento Bee stated, "Predictions that the Kings will leave town are swirling. Speculation has been running rampant, with cities such as San Jose, Anaheim, Kansas City and Las Vegas all bandied about as possible destinations."

"They may be history unless something changes,'' former city councilman Jimmie Yee told The Chronicle. But he added, "I'm not saying they're leaving. I don't know where they'd go that would give them the same support that the Kings have here.''

Like Yee, city councilman Steve Cohn has been pushing for a new arena. He insists the North Natomas land development plan is still alive. "Any time you've got a group willing to put $200 million on the table," he said, "that's a good starting point.''

The group originally had sought a ballot measure that would have expedited development of 9,000 acres of farmland into residential areas. Insiders say such a deal could cut the time of getting the development through the bureaucratic process from 10 years to five. More than 40,000 homes could be built on the land, and estimates on the potential payoff range from $2 billion to $5 billion.

In return, the landowners were going to divert about 20 percent of the expected proceeds, up to a ceiling of $275 million, to build an arena and create a $25 million endowment fund for the arts and youth sports. The Kings would kick in the rest, then keep all the new arena's revenues, and everybody would be happy.

The wheels came off the plan in January when some of the property owners, led by former Congressman Doug Ose, pulled out and took their 2,000 acres with them.

"Our estimates left us $80-90 million short of our $300 million goal,'' said Steve Thurtle, a member of the landowners' group. "We think it's a good idea, but we've exhausted our efforts.''

Just how much an arena would -- or should -- cost is debatable. The Kings want a $400 million facility, citing the higher costs of construction in California. Thurtle, Cohn and others think a $300 million home would be more reasonable, given the price tags of arenas in Memphis ($250 million), Charlotte ($265 million) and Kansas City ($250 million).

Those cities, however, don't operate under tax restrictions like California's Proposition 13. Also, labor costs are higher here, and Kings part- owner Bob Hernreich said, "The cost of steel has gone up 50 percent in the last year and a half.''

"Our problem,'' Cohn said, "is we don't have the level of corporate sponsorship you have in the Bay Area.''

Some of the deepest pockets in Sacramento belong to the Maloofs. The family recently announced it would spend $600 million to expand its Palms Casino Hotel in Las Vegas with a 40-story tower housing 347 hotel rooms and a 50-story tower with 599 luxury condos. The Maloofs were immediately criticized in Sacramento for refusing to build an arena with their own money or, at the least, to make up for the shortfall from the North Natomas plan. The Palms is highly profitable, while the ARCO/Kings operation barely makes money.

More to the point, most cities realize that in order to attract NBA franchises or keep them from leaving, publicly-funded arenas are standard procedure.

"Industry wide, roughly 20 percent of arena costs are paid for by the team, either in cash or debt service,'' Thurtle said. "The Kings are not the villain here.''

But even among people who love the Kings the most, it's far from unanimous that a new arena is needed. At a recent game, Chuck Arana, a 37-year- old fan, said he hopes ARCO is never replaced.

"You get a good view from wherever you're at in the arena,'' he said. "Everybody's happy when they come here. (In a new arena) you're just going to have a bunch of luxury boxes and people who don't care about the game, more business people who just come once in a while rather than people who come to every game.''

Rochester Royals/Cincinnati Royals/
Kansas City Kings-Omaha Kings/Sacramento Kings

Edgerton Park
Sports Arena

Edgerton Park Sports Arena
1945-1955
Rochester War
Memorial

Rochester War Memorial

1955-1957
Cincinnati
Gardens

Cincinnati Gardens

1957-1972
Municipal
Auditorium

Municipal Auditorium

1972-1974
Omaha
Civic Auditorium

Omaha Civic Auditorium

1972-1978
Kemper
Arena

Kemper Arena

1974-1985
ARCO
Arena I

ARCO Arena I

1957-1972
ARCO
Arena II

ARCO Arena II

1988-Present
Kings Arena
Kings Arena

Future


BALLPARKS.com © 1996-2008 by Munsey & Suppes.